GNU Emacs vs UltraEdit : Which is Better?
GNU Emacs VS UltraEdit Feature comparision
| Feature | GNU Emacs | UltraEdit |
|---|---|---|
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Self-documenting | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Extensions | ||
| IDE All Languages | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Scripting | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Python | ||
| Developer Tools | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes | ||
| Column based text editing | ||
| Hex Editor | ||
| Java IDE | ||
| Beauty and fluid interface | ||
| Code completion |
Compare GNU Emacs
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and GNU Emacs and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and GNU Emacs and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare CotEditor and GNU Emacs and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Builder and GNU Emacs and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare HippoEDIT and GNU Emacs and decide which is most suitable for you.