HippoEDIT VS GNU nano Feature comparision
| Feature | HippoEDIT | GNU nano |
|---|---|---|
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes |
Compare HippoEDIT
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and HippoEDIT and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and HippoEDIT and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare CotEditor and HippoEDIT and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare EditPad Lite and HippoEDIT and decide which is most suitable for you.
