MediaWiki vs Confluence Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

MediaWiki

MediaWiki is a free and open-source wiki software platform renowned for powering Wikipedia and countless other wikis globally. It provides a robust engine for collaborative content creation and knowledge management, offering a flexible and extensible environment for building information repositories.

Open Source

Categories:

Available for:

Self-Hosted PHP

Alternatives Details Website

Confluence

Confluence is a powerful team collaboration and knowledge management tool that helps teams create, organize, and discuss work effectively. It provides a central space for documentation, project planning, and team communication, making it easier for teams to stay connected and informed. by Atlassian

Commercial

Categories:

Available for:

Online Cloudron

Alternatives Details Website

Summary

MediaWiki and Confluence are both powerful solutions in their space. MediaWiki offers mediawiki is a free and open-source wiki software platform renowned for powering wikipedia and countless other wikis globally. it provides a robust engine for collaborative content creation and knowledge management, offering a flexible and extensible environment for building information repositories., while Confluence provides confluence is a powerful team collaboration and knowledge management tool that helps teams create, organize, and discuss work effectively. it provides a central space for documentation, project planning, and team communication, making it easier for teams to stay connected and informed.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

MediaWiki

Pros

Highly scalable and robust, proven to handle large knowledge bases.
Powerful version control and multi-user editing features.
Extensive extension system allows for significant customization and added functionality.
Large and active community provides excellent support and resources.
Open-source and free to use, offering cost savings.

Cons

Wikitext syntax can have a learning curve for new users compared to WYSIWYG editors.
Initial setup and configuration can require technical expertise.
Maintaining a large installation can require dedicated administrative effort.

Confluence

Pros

Excellent for creating and organizing documentation and knowledge bases.
Powerful collaborative editing features allow for real-time teamwork.
Seamless integration with Jira enhances project and documentation workflows.
Extensive marketplace for plugins and integrations offers significant customization.
Robust search functionality makes finding information easy.
Supports hierarchical organization of content for better structure.