MediaWiki icon

Top Alternatives to MediaWiki

Looking for MediaWiki alternatives? We've curated 13 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

Tomboy

Tomboy

Open Source

Tomboy is a free and open-source desktop note-taking application designed for simplicity and efficiency across Linux, Unix, Windows, and macOS. It utilizes a wiki-like interface for easy linking between notes and offers features like automatic linking, full-text search, and local storage, making it an accessible and reliable tool for organizing your thoughts and tasks.

Key Features

  • Simple and user-friendly interface.
  • Excellent wiki-like linking feature for connecting notes.
  • Notes stored locally, ensuring data privacy and offline access.

vs MediaWiki

Simple and user-friendly interface. compared to MediaWiki
wikidPad

wikidPad

Open Source

wikidPad is a free and open-source wiki-like notebook application that allows you to store your thoughts, notes, and snippets of information in a highly organized and cross-referenced manner. Its strength lies in the effortless creation of links between pages, making it easy to navigate and connect related ideas.

Key Features

  • Effortless creation of cross-links between pages.
  • Data is stored locally, ensuring privacy and offline access.
  • Flexible organization using both hierarchy and linking.

vs MediaWiki

Effortless creation of cross-links between pages. compared to MediaWiki
TiddlyWiki

TiddlyWiki

Open Source

TiddlyWiki is an innovative open-source, single-file, non-linear personal web notebook.

Key Features

  • Extremely portable due to single file nature.
  • Highly customizable and extensible with plugins.
  • Works entirely offline.

vs MediaWiki

Extremely portable due to single file nature. compared to MediaWiki
DokuWiki

DokuWiki

Open Source

DokuWiki is a popular open-source wiki software designed for simplicity, versatility, and scalability. It focuses on plain text files for data storage, eliminating the need for a database and offering a lightweight, portable, and easy-to-maintain solution for documentation, knowledge sharing, and collaborative content creation.

Key Features

  • Easy to install and maintain due to plain text storage.
  • No database required, reducing complexity.
  • Excellent revision control features.

vs MediaWiki

Easy to install and maintain due to plain text storage. compared to MediaWiki
XWiki

XWiki

Freemium

XWiki is a powerful, open-source wiki software platforms written in Java, designed for creating collaborative knowledge bases, documentation, and collaborative workspaces. With a strong emphasis on extensibility, it supports multiple languages, real-time collaboration, and a wide range of features for content management and team productivity.

Key Features

  • Highly extensible and customizable.
  • Strong real-time collaboration features.
  • Comprehensive feature set for content and knowledge management.

vs MediaWiki

Highly extensible and customizable. compared to MediaWiki
Fandom

Fandom

Free

Fandom is the world's largest fan platform, providing a space for enthusiasts to create, share, and explore communities around their favorite entertainment topics, from movies and TV shows to video games and comics. It serves as a comprehensive knowledge base and interactive community hub.

Key Features

  • Vast collection of user-generated content
  • Easy to use wiki creation and editing tools
  • Strong community features and engagement

vs MediaWiki

Vast collection of user-generated content compared to MediaWiki
Google Sites

Google Sites is a free and easy-to-use website builder that allows individuals and teams to create simple, functional websites for various purposes, from personal portfolios to internal team sites.

Key Features

  • Free to use
  • Easy drag-and-drop interface
  • Excellent Google Drive integration

vs MediaWiki

Free to use compared to MediaWiki
Confluence

Confluence

Commercial

Confluence is a powerful team collaboration and knowledge management tool that helps teams create, organize, and discuss work effectively. It provides a central space for documentation, project planning, and team communication, making it easier for teams to stay connected and informed.

Key Features

  • Excellent for creating and organizing documentation and knowledge bases.
  • Powerful collaborative editing features allow for real-time teamwork.
  • Seamless integration with Jira enhances project and documentation workflows.

vs MediaWiki

Excellent for creating and organizing documentation and knowledge bases. compared to MediaWiki
Nuclino

Nuclino

Freemium

Nuclino is a unified workspace designed for teams to collaborate, share, and organize knowledge efficiently. It combines wikis, documents, project management, and collaboration tools into a single, intuitive platform, fostering seamless teamwork and knowledge accessibility.

Key Features

  • Excellent visual organization options (Graph, Tree, Kanban).
  • Seamless real-time collaborative editing.
  • Easy creation and linking of knowledge base articles.

vs MediaWiki

Excellent visual organization options (Graph, Tree, Kanban). compared to MediaWiki
Microsoft SharePoint

Microsoft SharePoint is a robust, browser-based platform for collaborative document management and content sharing within organizations, designed to enhance teamwork and streamline workflows through its integrated suite of tools.

Key Features

  • Seamless integration with Microsoft 365 applications
  • Robust document management with version control and security features
  • Highly customizable team and communication sites

vs MediaWiki

Seamless integration with Microsoft 365 applications compared to MediaWiki
BookStack

BookStack

Open Source

BookStack is a free and open-source platform designed for creating and managing documentation and wiki content. Built with PHP and Laravel, it provides a straightforward and user-friendly interface for structuring information effectively for teams and individuals.

Key Features

  • Intuitive hierarchical structure (Books, Chapters, Pages) for clear organization.
  • Offers both WYSIWYG and Markdown editors catering to different user preferences.
  • Powerful search functionality for quickly finding information.

vs MediaWiki

Intuitive hierarchical structure (Books, Chapters, Pages) for clear organization. compared to MediaWiki
Lessons Learned Server

Lessons Learned Server (LLS) is a lightweight, web-based platform designed for creating and managing hierarchical knowledge bases. It enables users to store and organize textual information, documents, and multimedia content efficiently, making it ideal for documentation, collaborative note-taking, and internal knowledge sharing.

Key Features

  • Strong hierarchical organization for clear content structure.
  • Supports multiple content types including documents and media.
  • Real-time collaboration features for team productivity.

vs MediaWiki

Strong hierarchical organization for clear content structure. compared to MediaWiki
Pmwiki

Pmwiki

Open Source

PmWiki is a powerful and flexible open-source wiki-based content management system designed for collaborative documentation, knowledge sharing, and website creation. It focuses on ease of use and extensibility.

Key Features

  • Easy to use wiki markup and linking.
  • Highly extensible with a wide range of plugins.
  • Lightweight and performant.

vs MediaWiki

Easy to use wiki markup and linking. compared to MediaWiki

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how MediaWiki stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare