GNU nano VS HippoEDIT Feature comparision
| Feature | GNU nano | HippoEDIT |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes |
Compare GNU nano
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Builder and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
