Nautilus vs Thunar : Which is Better?
Nautilus
Nautilus a next-generation file manager for GNOME, akin to KDE's Konqueror. Developed by The GNOME Project
License: Open Source
VS
VS
Nautilus VS Thunar
Thunar is a lightweight and simple file manager ideal for users looking for speed and efficiency, while Nautilus offers a more feature-rich experience with advanced functionalities like cloud storage integration and plugin support. Users should choose Thunar for basic file management tasks and Nautilus for a more comprehensive file handling experience.
Nautilus
Pros:
- Feature-rich and versatile
- Supports multiple plugins
- Advanced search capabilities
- Built-in support for cloud storage
- User-friendly with a modern interface
Cons:
- Can be slower on older hardware
- More resource-intensive than Thunar
- Complex for users who prefer simplicity
Thunar
Pros:
- Lightweight and fast
- Customizable interface
- Simple and user-friendly
- Supports bulk renaming of files
- Integrated terminal
Cons:
- Limited features compared to more advanced file managers
- Lacks built-in file search functionality
- No support for cloud storage integration
Compare Nautilus
Compare Dolphin File Manager and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Double Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Far Manager and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Midnight Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare My Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Pantheon Files and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.