NVD3 VS Google Charts
Google Charts is best suited for users who need a simple and quick-to-implement solution with a wide variety of charts and easy integration with Google services. NVD3, on the other hand, offers advanced customization and is built on D3.js, making it ideal for developers looking for sophisticated visualizations and greater control over their charting solutions.
NVD3
Pros:
- Built on D3.js, allowing for advanced visualizations
- Good performance
- Supports a range of chart types
- Highly customizable
- Good community support
- Responsive design
- Export options available
- Easy to integrate with other libraries
- Cross-browser compatibility
- Animation effects available
Cons:
- Steeper learning curve than Google Charts
- Requires understanding of D3.js
- Less documentation than Google Charts
- Limited support for older browsers
- Not as beginner-friendly
Google Charts
Pros:
- Wide range of chart types
- Easy to use and implement
- Strong documentation
- Highly customizable
- Good performance with large datasets
- Responsive design
- Integration with Google products
- Cross-browser compatibility
- Rich interactivity features
- Flexible API
Cons:
- Limited advanced visualizations compared to NVD3
- Dependency on Google services
- Less control over backend data
- Limited export options
- Theming options are somewhat basic
Compare NVD3
Compare CanvasJS Charts and NVD3 and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare FusionCharts Suite XT and NVD3 and decide which is most suitable for you.
