Sakura vs PuTTY : Which is Better?
License: Open Source
VS
VS
Sakura VS PuTTY
PuTTY is a lightweight and highly configurable SSH client known for its simplicity and versatility, while Sakura offers a more modern multi-tabbed interface with additional features for session management and ease of use. Both applications are free and open-source but cater to slightly different user preferences.
Sakura
Pros:
- Free and open-source
- Multi-tabbed interface for easy session management
- Customizable keyboard shortcuts
- Built-in support for SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin
- Supports Unicode and various character encodings
- Easy to use with a straightforward interface
- Saves connection history for quick access
- Supports drag-and-drop file transfer
- Allows for customizable themes and colors
- Integrated terminal features like split view
Cons:
- Limited customization for advanced users
- Occasional bugs in newer versions
- Performance issues with many simultaneous sessions
PuTTY
Pros:
- Free and open-source
- Supports SSH, Telnet, and Rlogin protocols
- Highly configurable with various options
- Supports X11 forwarding
- Portability (can run from USB drive)
- Supports multiple sessions in tabs
- Supports public key authentication
- Customizable appearance (fonts, colors)
- Can save session profiles
- Lightweight and low resource usage
Cons:
- Limited support for advanced scripting
- No built-in file transfer capabilities
- User interface may feel outdated
- Does not have a built-in password manager
- Limited documentation compared to alternatives
Compare Sakura
Compare Cool Retro Term and Sakura and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Terminal and Sakura and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Remote Desktop Manager and Sakura and decide which is most suitable for you.
