Chrome Secure Shell vs mRemoteNG : Which is Better?

Chrome Secure Shell icon

Chrome Secure Shell

Chrome Secure Shell is a xterm-compatible terminal emulator and stand-alone ssh client for Chrome. Developed by Google

License: Free

Apps available for Mac OS X Windows Linux Chrome OS Google Chrome

VS
VS
mRemoteNG icon

mRemoteNG

mRemoteNG is the next generation of mRemote, open source, tabbed, multi-protocol, remote connections manager.

License: Open Source

Categories: Network & Admin

Apps available for Windows

Chrome Secure Shell VS mRemoteNG

mRemoteNG is a versatile remote connection manager that supports multiple protocols and provides a rich GUI experience for managing sessions, while Chrome Secure Shell is a lightweight, browser-based SSH client focused solely on SSH access. mRemoteNG is better suited for users needing diverse remote access options, whereas Chrome Secure Shell excels in quick and secure SSH terminal access.

Chrome Secure Shell

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Directly integrated with Google Chrome
  • Good for SSH connections
  • Supports mobile access
  • Easy to use for quick terminal access
  • Offers plugin support for additional functionality
  • Minimal installation required
  • Secure by default due to Chrome's security features
  • User-friendly for those familiar with Chrome
  • Automatically updates with the browser

Cons:

  • Limited to SSH protocol only
  • Requires Google Chrome to run
  • Less customizable than desktop applications
  • Not suitable for non-SSH connections
  • No built-in credential management
  • Limited session management features
  • Dependent on internet connection
  • Not open-source
  • No support for remote desktop protocols
  • Lacks advanced features like SFTP

mRemoteNG

Pros:

  • Supports multiple remote access protocols
  • User-friendly GUI interface
  • Ability to manage multiple sessions with tabs
  • Built-in credential management system
  • Open-source and free to use
  • Customizable appearance for better usability
  • Supports remote desktop protocol (RDP) connections
  • Includes port forwarding capabilities
  • SFTP support for file transfers
  • Integration with various tools and plugins

Cons:

  • Limited to Windows and Linux platforms
  • No SSH client support
  • Not suitable for quick command line access
  • Can be resource-intensive for larger sessions
  • Occasional bugs and stability issues
  • Less optimal for mobile use
  • Learning curve for new users
  • Limited community support compared to popular clients
  • No session recording feature
  • Requires installation and configuration

Compare Chrome Secure Shell

vs
Compare ConnectBot and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare ConsoleZ and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FireSSH and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Hyper and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare iTerm and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare JuiceSSH and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare KiTTY and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Konsole and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare LXTerminal and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare MobaXterm and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PAC Manager and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PuTTY and Chrome Secure Shell and decide which is most suitable for you.