Telegram vs Tox Comparison
Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

Telegram
Telegram is a fast and secure cloud-based instant messaging platform offering robust privacy features, large group support, file sharing, and cross-platform synchronization, making it a versatile communication tool. by Telegram LLC

Tox
Tox is a free, open-source, and secure peer-to-peer instant messaging and video calling protocol designed for strong privacy and censorship resistance. It provides end-to-end encrypted communications without reliance on central servers. by Project Tox
Summary
Telegram and Tox are both powerful solutions in their space. Telegram offers telegram is a fast and secure cloud-based instant messaging platform offering robust privacy features, large group support, file sharing, and cross-platform synchronization, making it a versatile communication tool., while Tox provides tox is a free, open-source, and secure peer-to-peer instant messaging and video calling protocol designed for strong privacy and censorship resistance. it provides end-to-end encrypted communications without reliance on central servers.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.
Pros & Cons Comparison

Telegram
Pros
- Strong focus on privacy and security features.
- Fast and reliable message delivery, even on weak networks.
- Generous file size limit and cloud storage.
- Supports very large groups and channels.
- Available across a wide range of devices and platforms.
- Open API and extensive bot capabilities.
Cons
- Default encryption for regular chats is not end-to-end.
- Network effect; utility depends on contacts also using the platform.
- Reliance on a phone number for initial registration.

Tox
Pros
- Decentralized architecture enhances privacy and censorship resistance.
- End-to-end encryption for all communication types by default.
- No central servers mean no central point of failure or data collection.
- Open-source protocol allows for independent verification of security.
- Ad-free communication experience.
Cons
- User experience can be inconsistent depending on the client used.
- Discovering and adding contacts can be less convenient than centralized platforms.
- Both users must be online simultaneously for direct communication.
- Group chat functionality and stability can vary significantly between clients.
- Lack of features like message history sync across multiple devices by default due to decentralization.
Compare With Others
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.
Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.