Textadept VS SciTE Feature comparision
| Feature | Textadept | SciTE |
|---|---|---|
| Command line interface | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Lua scripting | ||
| Portable | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes | ||
| Native application | ||
| Built-in themes | ||
| Live Preview | ||
| Integrated FTP client |
Compare Textadept
Compare Aptana Studio and Textadept and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and Textadept and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNU Emacs and Textadept and decide which is most suitable for you.
