Thunar vs Xfe

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Thunar icon

Thunar

Thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the Xfce desktop environment and other Unix-like systems. Designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins. by Xfce, Benedikt Meurer, Jannis Pohlmann, Nick Schermer

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:
VS
Xfe icon

Xfe

Xfe is a lightweight and fast graphical file manager for the X Window System, providing essential file management operations with a focus on efficiency and customization.

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Thunar and Xfe are both powerful solutions in their space. Thunar offers thunar is a modern, lightweight, and fast file manager for the xfce desktop environment and other unix-like systems. designed for simplicity and speed, it focuses on delivering a highly responsive file browsing experience directly out of the box, while remaining easily customizable through plugins., while Xfe provides xfe is a lightweight and fast graphical file manager for the x window system, providing essential file management operations with a focus on efficiency and customization.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Thunar

Thunar

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Simple and intuitive user interface
Powerful batch renamer included
Highly extensible through a plugin system
Low resource consumption

Limitations

Core features are intentionally basic, relying on plugins for advanced functionality
Limited built-in support for some network protocols (e.g., FTP) compared to other file managers
Xfe

Xfe

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely fast and lightweight
Efficient dual-pane interface
Integrated console access
Low resource consumption
Supports basic file compression and preview

Limitations

User interface feels dated
Limited advanced features compared to some alternatives
Plugin ecosystem is small
Basic support for network protocols

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare