Xarchiver vs File Roller : Which is Better?

Xarchiver icon

Xarchiver

Xarchiver is a front-end to various command line archiving tools for Linux and BSD operating systems, designed to be independent of the desktop environment. It is the default archiving application of Xfce and LXDE. Developed by Giuseppe Torelli - Colossus

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux BSD Xfce

VS
VS
File Roller icon

File Roller

Archive Manager (File Roller) is the archive manager of the GNOME desktop environment. Developed by Paolo Bacchilega

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux GNOME

Xarchiver VS File Roller

File Roller is a more feature-rich archiving tool, offering robust support for various formats and advanced features like multi-threading and extensive customizability. In contrast, Xarchiver is lightweight and simple, making it ideal for users who prefer a straightforward tool for basic archiving tasks without the overhead.

Xarchiver

Pros:

  • Lightweight and fast
  • Supports plugin extensions for added functionality
  • Good integration with lightweight desktop environments
  • Simple and straightforward user interface
  • Offers a good selection of supported formats
  • Provides basic file management features
  • Efficient performance for basic tasks
  • Localization support for multiple languages
  • Consistent updates and community support
  • Low resource usage

Cons:

  • Less feature-rich than File Roller
  • Limited compression options
  • No multi-threading support
  • Lacks advanced file management features
  • Less frequent updates compared to File Roller

File Roller

Pros:

  • Integrates well with GNOME desktop
  • Supports a wide range of archive formats
  • User-friendly interface with drag and drop functionality
  • Fast extraction and compression speeds
  • Multi-threading support for better performance
  • Good file management features
  • Supports encryption for secure archives
  • Active development and updates
  • Comprehensive documentation available
  • Highly customizable options

Cons:

  • Heavy on resources compared to lightweight alternatives
  • Limited plugin options
  • Less suitable for very basic users
  • Customization options may be overwhelming for beginners
  • Not as portable as Xarchiver

Compare Xarchiver

vs
Compare 7-Zip and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare 7z SFX-Creator and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare AppCompactor and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare B1 Free Archiver and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bandizip and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare BetterZip and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Bitser and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FreeArc and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FreeCommander and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare IZArc and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Keka and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare p7zip and Xarchiver and decide which is most suitable for you.