zathura vs MuPDF

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

zathura icon

zathura

Zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the Poppler rendering engine. It is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings. by pwmt.org

Open Source
Platforms: Linux Xfce
Screenshots:
VS
MuPDF icon

MuPDF

MuPDF is a lightweight, portable document rendering engine and viewer for PDF, XPS, and EPUB formats. Known for its speed and accurate rendering, it's ideal for integrating document display into various applications or for users seeking a minimalist, high-performance viewer. by Artifex Software, Inc.

Open Source
Platforms: Windows Linux Android iPhone iPad Xfce
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

zathura and MuPDF are both powerful solutions in their space. zathura offers zathura is a highly customizable and efficient document viewer based on the poppler rendering engine. it is designed with a minimal interface and focuses on keyboard-driven navigation, making it ideal for users who prefer a streamlined workflow and powerful keybindings., while MuPDF provides mupdf is a lightweight, portable document rendering engine and viewer for pdf, xps, and epub formats. known for its speed and accurate rendering, it's ideal for integrating document display into various applications or for users seeking a minimalist, high-performance viewer.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

zathura

zathura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Excellent keyboard navigation for efficient browsing.
Highly customizable through a simple configuration file.
Minimalistic and clean user interface.
Low memory usage makes it suitable for older systems.
Supports multiple document formats via backends.

Limitations

Steep learning curve for users unfamiliar with keyboard shortcuts.
Lacks advanced features found in mainstream viewers (e.g., comprehensive annotation, form filling).
Configuration requires editing a text file.
No graphical menus or toolbars for easy access to options.
MuPDF

MuPDF

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Exceptional performance and speed in rendering documents.
Very low memory and resource usage.
Highly portable and works across numerous platforms.
Provides accurate rendering of complex document layouts.
Ideal as a core component for developers building custom document applications.

Limitations

Standalone viewer is very minimalist and lacks advanced features like extensive annotation or form filling.
Primarily a rendering engine; manipulation features are not its core focus.
User interface of the standalone viewer may be too basic for some users.
Doesn't include features like OCR or digital signatures out-of-the-box.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare