Application Discontinued: Open Web Analytics might have been discontinued. View alternatives

Open Web Analytics icon

Open Web Analytics

Open Web Analytics (OWA) is a discontinued open-source web analytics platform designed to provide detailed insights into website traffic and user behavior. Offering real-time data, visitor recording, and various monitoring capabilities, it aimed to be a privacy-conscious alternative to commercial analytics solutions.

Peter Adams

License

Open Source

Platforms

Online Self-Hosted Discontinued

About Open Web Analytics

Open Web Analytics: A Look Back at an Open-Source Analytics Platform

Open Web Analytics (OWA) was an open-source project that provided a suite of tools for understanding website performance and visitor interactions. Developed using PHP, it offered a self-hosted solution for webmasters and data analysts seeking detailed insights without relying on third-party services that might raise privacy concerns.

At its core, OWA focused on delivering comprehensive traffic analysis. This included tracking metrics such as page views, unique visitors, bounce rates, and traffic sources. Users could segment their data to understand visitor behavior based on criteria like geography, browser type, and referring websites.

One of the standout features during its active development was real-time analytics. This allowed users to see visitor activity as it happened, providing immediate feedback on marketing campaigns, new content, or website changes. This real-time data was crucial for making timely decisions and responding to trends quickly.

OWA also included visitor recording, a powerful tool for understanding how users navigated and interacted with specific pages. By visually reconstructing visitor sessions, users could identify usability issues, drop-off points in conversion funnels, and overall user experience pain points. Complementary to this was the Mouse Heatmaps functionality, which visually represented where users clicked, moved their mouse, and scrolled on a page, offering further insights into engagement and attention.

For those interested in optimizing their websites for specific goals, OWA offered features related to Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO). While not as extensive as dedicated CRO platforms, it provided the foundational data needed to identify areas for improvement and measure the impact of changes designed to increase conversions.

The platform also included capabilities for basic Monitoring, encompassing areas like Application Performance Monitoring (APM), Cloud Monitoring, and Error Logging. While not as deep or feature-rich as dedicated monitoring systems, these features provided an integrated way to observe some technical aspects alongside user behavior data.

A significant emphasis of OWA was itsPrivacy-focused approach. As a self-hosted solution, users retained complete control over their data, eliminating concerns about data sharing or tracking by external companies. This made it an attractive option for organizations and individuals prioritizing data privacy and compliance.

OWA also leveraged features like a Tag Manager, which simplified the process of adding and managing various tracking codes and scripts without requiring direct modifications to website code. This was particularly useful for integrating with other services or tracking specific events.

Technical users could leverage the integrated Web log analysis capabilities, allowing for the parsing and analysis of raw web server logs to gain additional insights into traffic and server activity, complementing the JavaScript-based tracking.

While development has ceased, Open Web Analytics represented a compelling open-source alternative in the web analytics space, particularly for those prioritizing data control and privacy. Its feature set provided a solid foundation for understanding visitor behavior and website performance.

Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Self-hosted solution provides complete data control
  • Open source and free to use
  • Includes features like real-time analytics and visitor recording
  • Strong focus on data privacy

Cons

  • Project development is discontinued, no longer maintained
  • User interface is less modern and intuitive compared to current tools
  • Lack of ongoing security updates and feature enhancements
  • Requires technical expertise to install and manage

What Makes Open Web Analytics Stand Out

Self-Hosted Solution

Users retain complete control over their data by hosting the analytics platform on their own infrastructure.

Open Source

Free to use, modify, and distribute under its open-source license.

Focus on Privacy

Designed with data privacy in mind, offering an alternative to third-party tracking services.

Features & Capabilities

18 features

Expert Review

Review of Open Web Analytics (OWA)

Open Web Analytics (OWA) was an ambitious open-source project that aimed to provide a comprehensive web analytics solution as an alternative to proprietary platforms. Developed in PHP, OWA offered a self-hosted approach, placing control and ownership of data directly in the hands of the user. This fundamental aspect of its design was a significant differentiator, particularly for individuals and organizations with strong data privacy requirements or those seeking to avoid the costs associated with commercial analytics services.

Core Functionality and Features

At its core, OWA delivered the essential metrics expected from a web analytics platform. Traffic analysis was robust, providing insights into visitors, visits, page views, and the sources driving traffic to a website. The ability to track referring websites, search engine queries, and geographical locations of visitors offered valuable context for understanding the audience.

One of the more impressive features for an open-source project of its time was the inclusion of Real-time analytics. This allowed for immediate observation of live traffic, which is critical for monitoring the impact of campaigns, responding to traffic surges, or identifying issues as they occur. The real-time dashboard, while perhaps not as polished as modern commercial tools, provided a functional window into current website activity.

The Visitor recording feature was another notable addition. This capability, often found only in specialized or premium analytics tools, allowed users to watch replays of individual visitor sessions. This provided invaluable qualitative data on how users navigated pages, interacted with elements, and potentially encountered usability hurdles. When combined with Mouse Heatmaps, which visualized click, movement, and scroll patterns, users could gain deep insights into user engagement on specific pages.

OWA also incorporated a basic Tag Manager. This simplified the process of adding and managing various third-party tracking scripts and event tags without needing to directly modify website code. While simpler than dedicated tag management systems, it provided a useful abstraction layer for managing different analytics and marketing tags.

The platform's ambition extended to include various monitoring capabilities, including basic APM, Cloud, Network, Data, and Hardware monitoring, alongside error logging and general logging. It's important to note that these monitoring features were generally less feature-rich and sophisticated than dedicated enterprise-level monitoring systems, but their inclusion within an analytics platform was an interesting approach, aiming for a more unified view of website health and user behavior.

For users interested in optimizing their websites for specific outcomes, OWA included features relevant to Conversion Rate Optimization (CRO). While not providing A/B testing or advanced experimentation frameworks, it offered the necessary data and reporting to identify conversion funnels, measure completion rates, and understand where users might be dropping off.

User Experience and Implementation

As a self-hosted application, the implementation of OWA required technical proficiency. Users needed to set up a web server environment with PHP and a database (typically MySQL). The installation process, while documented, could be a barrier for those without experience in server administration. Once installed, the user interface was functional, providing navigation to various reports and features. However, compared to the intuitive and highly polished interfaces of modern cloud-based analytics platforms, OWA's UI felt somewhat dated and less user-friendly, particularly for novice users.

The reports provided the core data, but customization options were generally less extensive than in commercial alternatives. Creating custom dashboards or deeply segmented reports often required a deeper understanding of the underlying data structure or reliance on the API.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The primary strength of OWA was undoubtedly its open-source nature and self-hosted model. This provided complete control over data privacy and independence from third-party vendors. For organizations handling sensitive data or operating in strict regulatory environments, this was a significant advantage.

Another strength was the inclusion of features like real-time analytics, visitor recording, and heatmaps, which went beyond basic traffic reporting and offered deeper insights into user behavior.

However, OWA had notable weaknesses. Foremost among these is its discontinued development status. This means no further updates, security patches, or new features will be released, making it a risky choice for production environments due to potential security vulnerabilities and lack of support for newer web technologies.

Beyond the discontinuation, the user interface and reporting capabilities were less refined than those of leading commercial platforms. The monitoring features, while present, were not a replacement for dedicated monitoring solutions.

Conclusion

Open Web Analytics was a commendable open-source effort to provide robust web analytics with a strong emphasis on privacy. Its feature set, including real-time data and visitor recording, was impressive for a self-hosted tool. However, its discontinued status significantly limits its practical viability for new implementations. While it served as a valuable tool for many during its active life cycle, the lack of ongoing development and support makes it difficult to recommend for current use cases, particularly in environments where security and up-to-date features are critical.

Screenshots

Similar Apps

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare