Apache Cassandra vs Oracle Database : Which is Better?
Apache Cassandra VS Oracle Database
Oracle Database is a relational database management system known for its strong ACID compliance and robust transaction support, making it ideal for structured data scenarios. In contrast, Apache Cassandra is a NoSQL database designed for high scalability and availability, best suited for handling large volumes of unstructured data across distributed systems.
Apache Cassandra
Pros:
- Highly scalable and distributed architecture
- Excellent for handling large volumes of data
- Flexible data model
- High availability with no single point of failure
- Great for write-heavy workloads
Cons:
- Eventual consistency model may complicate data retrieval
- Limited query capabilities compared to SQL
- Lacks built-in support for transactions
- Higher learning curve for developers
- Not suited for complex queries
Oracle Database
Pros:
- Strong ACID compliance
- Advanced query capabilities
- Robust transaction support
- Comprehensive backup and recovery options
- Rich ecosystem and tooling
Cons:
- Costly licensing
- Complex setup and management
- Resource-intensive
- Not ideal for unstructured data
- Limited horizontal scaling
Compare Apache Cassandra
Compare CouchBase and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare CouchDB and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MariaDB and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Microsoft SQL Server and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MongoDB and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare MySQL Community Edition and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare PostgreSQL and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Redis and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare RethinkDB and Apache Cassandra and decide which is most suitable for you.