File Roller vs IZArc Comparison

Compare features to find which solution is best for your needs.

File Roller icon

File Roller

File Roller is the official archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. It supports a wide range of popular archive formats. by Paolo Bacchilega

Open Source
Categories:
Available for:
Linux GNOME
VS
IZArc icon

IZArc

IZArc is a powerful file archiving utility that supports a wide range of compression formats including ZIP, RAR, 7Z, and many more. It provides robust features for creating, extracting, and managing archives, with integrated tools for enhanced user experience. by Ivan Zahariev

Free
Categories:
Available for:
Windows iPhone iPad Warning Bundleware

Summary

File Roller and IZArc are both powerful solutions in their space. File Roller offers file roller is the official archive manager for the gnome desktop environment, providing a simple and intuitive way to create, view, and extract archive files. it supports a wide range of popular archive formats., while IZArc provides izarc is a powerful file archiving utility that supports a wide range of compression formats including zip, rar, 7z, and many more. it provides robust features for creating, extracting, and managing archives, with integrated tools for enhanced user experience.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

File Roller

File Roller

Pros

  • Excellent integration with GNOME desktop.
  • Simple and intuitive user interface.
  • Supports a wide range of common archive formats.
  • Easy to use for basic compression and extraction.
  • Lightweight and resource-efficient.

Cons

  • Lacks advanced features found in specialized archiving software.
  • Limited options for fine-tuning compression settings.
  • May not support all niche archive formats.
IZArc

IZArc

Pros

  • Supports a very wide range of archive formats.
  • Includes useful features like built-in viewer and archive conversion.
  • Seamless integration with Windows Explorer for quick access.
  • Generally fast performance for compression and extraction.

Cons

  • User interface feels somewhat outdated.
  • Potential for bundled software during installation requires careful attention.

Compare With Others

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features, pricing, and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare