GNU nano vs Aquamacs Emacs : Which is Better?
GNU nano VS Aquamacs Emacs Feature comparision
| Feature | GNU nano | Aquamacs Emacs |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| EMACS | ||
| Java | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Python | ||
| Developer Tools | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Spell checking | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes |
Compare GNU nano
Compare Bluefish Editor and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Builder and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
