GNU nano vs Editra : Which is Better?
GNU nano VS Editra Feature comparision
| Feature | GNU nano | Editra |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Python | ||
| Developer Tools | ||
| Code completion | ||
| Embedded debugger | ||
| Intellisense | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Java IDE | ||
| Beauty and fluid interface | ||
| Spell checking |
Compare GNU nano
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Builder and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
