GNU nano vs UltraEdit : Which is Better?
GNU nano VS UltraEdit Feature comparision
| Feature | GNU nano | UltraEdit |
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Indentation | ||
| Command line interface | ||
| Search and replace | ||
| Terminal-based | ||
| Column based text editing | ||
| Hex Editor | ||
| Lightweight | ||
| Code formatting | ||
| Tabbed interface | ||
| Custom Language Definitions | ||
| Extensible by Plugins/Extensions | ||
| Built-in Terminal | ||
| Autocompletion | ||
| Customizable | ||
| Support for Themes | ||
| Community based | ||
| Package Control | ||
| Syntax Highlighting | ||
| Python | ||
| Developer Tools | ||
| Better syntax highlighting support | ||
| Debian package compatible | ||
| FOSS | ||
| Java IDE | ||
| Beauty and fluid interface | ||
| Code completion | ||
| Cross-platform | ||
| Editable text color schemes |
Compare GNU nano
Compare Aquamacs Emacs and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare Bluefish Editor and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
Compare GNOME Builder and GNU nano and decide which is most suitable for you.
