Nautilus vs Dolphin File Manager : Which is Better?

Nautilus icon

Nautilus

Nautilus a next-generation file manager for GNOME, akin to KDE's Konqueror. Developed by The GNOME Project

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux

VS
VS
Dolphin File Manager icon

Dolphin File Manager

Dolphin is a lightweight file manager. It has been designed with ease of use and simplicity in mind, while still allowing flexibility and customization. Developed by Peter Penz

License: Open Source

Categories: File Management

Apps available for Linux KDE

Nautilus VS Dolphin File Manager

Nautilus provides a simple and clean interface, making it ideal for everyday users, especially those on the GNOME desktop. In contrast, Dolphin offers a more feature-rich experience with advanced customization options, multi-panel views, and plugin support, catering to power users who require more flexibility in their file management.

Nautilus

Pros:

  • Simple and clean user interface
  • Good integration with GNOME
  • Supports various network protocols
  • Fast file operations
  • Built-in terminal for advanced tasks
  • Strong file search functionality
  • Bookmarking system for quick access
  • Good accessibility features
  • Lightweight and resource-efficient
  • Multiple view options

Cons:

  • Limited customizability compared to Dolphin
  • Lacks multi-panel view
  • Fewer plugin options
  • Less feature-rich than Dolphin
  • Not as flexible for advanced users
  • Limited configuration options
  • Occasional performance issues with large directories
  • Less support for advanced file operations

Dolphin File Manager

Pros:

  • Highly customizable interface
  • Supports plugins for extended functionality
  • Multi-panel view for efficient file management
  • Rich support for KDE features
  • Integrated terminal
  • Advanced file preview options
  • Highly detailed context menus
  • Sync with cloud services
  • Extensive keyboard shortcuts
  • Good customization for KDE environments

Cons:

  • Can be overwhelming for new users
  • Heavier on system resources
  • More complex configuration options
  • Less integration with non-KDE environments
  • May not perform as well on lower-end machines
  • Requires additional setup for optimal use
  • Can be buggy with certain plugins
  • Some features may feel cluttered

Compare Nautilus

vs
Compare Double Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Far Manager and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare FileZilla and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Finder and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Forklift and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare GNOME Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Marlin and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Midnight Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare My Commander and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Nemo and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare Pantheon Files and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.
vs
Compare PCMan File Manager and Nautilus and decide which is most suitable for you.