Sakura vs Hyper

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Sakura icon

Sakura

Sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on GTK and libvte. It provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on Linux systems. by david@pleyades.net

Open Source
Platforms: Linux BSD
Screenshots:
VS
Hyper icon

Hyper

Hyper is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator built on Electron, offering a modern and cross-platform solution for interacting with command-line environments. It provides a sleek interface, extensive plugin ecosystem, and supports various connection methods including SSH and serial. by ZEIT

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux Electron / Atom Shell
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

Sakura and Hyper are both powerful solutions in their space. Sakura offers sakura is a minimalist and lightweight terminal emulator built on gtk and libvte. it provides essential terminal functionalities with a focus on performance and simplicity, making it a solid choice for users who value a clean and efficient command-line experience on linux systems., while Hyper provides hyper is a powerful and highly customizable terminal emulator built on electron, offering a modern and cross-platform solution for interacting with command-line environments. it provides a sleek interface, extensive plugin ecosystem, and supports various connection methods including ssh and serial.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Sakura

Sakura

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Extremely lightweight and fast.
Clean and minimalist user interface.
Excellent input responsiveness.
Stable and reliable performance.

Limitations

Lacks advanced features like built-in tabs or split-panes.
Limited customization options compared to some competitors.
Hyper

Hyper

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly customizable through plugins and themes.
Modern and visually appealing user interface.
Cross-platform compatibility (Windows, macOS, Linux).
Built-in SSH client.
Active community and open-source development.

Limitations

Can have a larger memory footprint compared to native terminals.
Performance may vary depending on system resources and active plugins.
Configuration primarily through a text file may be less intuitive for some users.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare