MediaWiki icon

MediaWiki Alternatives for Online

Looking for MediaWiki alternatives? We've curated 10 top alternatives that offer similar functionality. Whether you need Online options, free plans, or open source solutions, explore our comprehensive list to find the perfect fit for your needs.

TiddlyWiki

TiddlyWiki

Open Source

TiddlyWiki is an innovative open-source, single-file, non-linear personal web notebook.

Key Features

  • Extremely portable due to single file nature.
  • Highly customizable and extensible with plugins.
  • Works entirely offline.

vs MediaWiki

Extremely portable due to single file nature. compared to MediaWiki
XWiki

XWiki

Freemium

XWiki is a powerful, open-source wiki software platforms written in Java, designed for creating collaborative knowledge bases, documentation, and collaborative workspaces. With a strong emphasis on extensibility, it supports multiple languages, real-time collaboration, and a wide range of features for content management and team productivity.

Key Features

  • Highly extensible and customizable.
  • Strong real-time collaboration features.
  • Comprehensive feature set for content and knowledge management.

vs MediaWiki

Highly extensible and customizable. compared to MediaWiki
Fandom

Fandom

Free

Fandom is the world's largest fan platform, providing a space for enthusiasts to create, share, and explore communities around their favorite entertainment topics, from movies and TV shows to video games and comics. It serves as a comprehensive knowledge base and interactive community hub.

Key Features

  • Vast collection of user-generated content
  • Easy to use wiki creation and editing tools
  • Strong community features and engagement

vs MediaWiki

Vast collection of user-generated content compared to MediaWiki
Google Sites

Google Sites is a free and easy-to-use website builder that allows individuals and teams to create simple, functional websites for various purposes, from personal portfolios to internal team sites.

Key Features

  • Free to use
  • Easy drag-and-drop interface
  • Excellent Google Drive integration

vs MediaWiki

Free to use compared to MediaWiki
Confluence

Confluence

Commercial

Confluence is a powerful team collaboration and knowledge management tool that helps teams create, organize, and discuss work effectively. It provides a central space for documentation, project planning, and team communication, making it easier for teams to stay connected and informed.

Key Features

  • Excellent for creating and organizing documentation and knowledge bases.
  • Powerful collaborative editing features allow for real-time teamwork.
  • Seamless integration with Jira enhances project and documentation workflows.

vs MediaWiki

Excellent for creating and organizing documentation and knowledge bases. compared to MediaWiki
Nuclino

Nuclino

Freemium

Nuclino is a unified workspace designed for teams to collaborate, share, and organize knowledge efficiently. It combines wikis, documents, project management, and collaboration tools into a single, intuitive platform, fostering seamless teamwork and knowledge accessibility.

Key Features

  • Excellent visual organization options (Graph, Tree, Kanban).
  • Seamless real-time collaborative editing.
  • Easy creation and linking of knowledge base articles.

vs MediaWiki

Excellent visual organization options (Graph, Tree, Kanban). compared to MediaWiki
Microsoft SharePoint

Microsoft SharePoint is a robust, browser-based platform for collaborative document management and content sharing within organizations, designed to enhance teamwork and streamline workflows through its integrated suite of tools.

Key Features

  • Seamless integration with Microsoft 365 applications
  • Robust document management with version control and security features
  • Highly customizable team and communication sites

vs MediaWiki

Seamless integration with Microsoft 365 applications compared to MediaWiki
BookStack

BookStack

Open Source

BookStack is a free and open-source platform designed for creating and managing documentation and wiki content. Built with PHP and Laravel, it provides a straightforward and user-friendly interface for structuring information effectively for teams and individuals.

Key Features

  • Intuitive hierarchical structure (Books, Chapters, Pages) for clear organization.
  • Offers both WYSIWYG and Markdown editors catering to different user preferences.
  • Powerful search functionality for quickly finding information.

vs MediaWiki

Intuitive hierarchical structure (Books, Chapters, Pages) for clear organization. compared to MediaWiki
Lessons Learned Server

Lessons Learned Server (LLS) is a lightweight, web-based platform designed for creating and managing hierarchical knowledge bases. It enables users to store and organize textual information, documents, and multimedia content efficiently, making it ideal for documentation, collaborative note-taking, and internal knowledge sharing.

Key Features

  • Strong hierarchical organization for clear content structure.
  • Supports multiple content types including documents and media.
  • Real-time collaboration features for team productivity.

vs MediaWiki

Strong hierarchical organization for clear content structure. compared to MediaWiki
Notion

Notion

Freemium

Notion is an all-in-one workspace that combines notes, documents, wikis, project management, and databases into a single, highly flexible platform. It empowers teams and individuals to manage knowledge, plan projects, track tasks, and collaborate seamlessly, adapting to nearly any workflow or organizational structure.

Key Features

  • Extremely flexible and customizable, adapting to diverse workflows.
  • Powerful database features with multiple views (Kanban, Calendar, Table) for dynamic data management.
  • Excellent real-time collaboration capabilities for teams.

vs MediaWiki

Extremely flexible and customizable, adapting to diverse workflows. compared to MediaWiki

Compare Side-by-Side

Want to see how MediaWiki stacks up against alternatives? Select any option below for a detailed comparison.

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare