Confluence vs MediaWiki

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

Confluence

Confluence is a powerful team collaboration and knowledge management tool that helps teams create, organize, and discuss work effectively. It provides a central space for documentation, project planning, and team communication, making it easier for teams to stay connected and informed. by Atlassian

Commercial

Platforms: Online Cloudron

Screenshots:

Alternatives Details Website

MediaWiki

MediaWiki is a free and open-source wiki software platform renowned for powering Wikipedia and countless other wikis globally. It provides a robust engine for collaborative content creation and knowledge management, offering a flexible and extensible environment for building information repositories.

Open Source

Platforms: Self-Hosted PHP

Alternatives Details Website

Comparison Summary

Confluence and MediaWiki are both powerful solutions in their space. Confluence offers confluence is a powerful team collaboration and knowledge management tool that helps teams create, organize, and discuss work effectively. it provides a central space for documentation, project planning, and team communication, making it easier for teams to stay connected and informed., while MediaWiki provides mediawiki is a free and open-source wiki software platform renowned for powering wikipedia and countless other wikis globally. it provides a robust engine for collaborative content creation and knowledge management, offering a flexible and extensible environment for building information repositories.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

Confluence

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Excellent for creating and organizing documentation and knowledge bases.

Powerful collaborative editing features allow for real-time teamwork.

Seamless integration with Jira enhances project and documentation workflows.

Extensive marketplace for plugins and integrations offers significant customization.

Robust search functionality makes finding information easy.

Supports hierarchical organization of content for better structure.

Limitations

Can have a learning curve for users unfamiliar with wiki platforms.

Performance can sometimes be an issue with very large instances.

Customization and administration can be complex for less technical users.

Cost can be a factor for smaller teams or budget-conscious organizations.

MediaWiki

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Highly scalable and robust, proven to handle large knowledge bases.

Powerful version control and multi-user editing features.

Extensive extension system allows for significant customization and added functionality.

Large and active community provides excellent support and resources.

Open-source and free to use, offering cost savings.

Limitations

Wikitext syntax can have a learning curve for new users compared to WYSIWYG editors.

Initial setup and configuration can require technical expertise.

Maintaining a large installation can require dedicated administrative effort.