StarUML vs ArgoUML

Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find which solution is best for your needs.

StarUML icon

StarUML

StarUML is a robust modeling platform supporting a wide range of diagrams including UML, SysML, and BPMN. It offers powerful features for software engineering, data modeling, and business process modeling. by Minkyu Lee (MKLab)

Commercial
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:
VS
ArgoUML icon

ArgoUML

ArgoUML is a Java-based, open-source UML modeling tool designed for creating dynamic and static diagrams in a structured manner. It supports a wide range of UML 1.4 diagrams and offers features to aid in the design process. by CollabNet

Open Source
Platforms: Mac OS X Windows Linux
Screenshots:

Comparison Summary

StarUML and ArgoUML are both powerful solutions in their space. StarUML offers staruml is a robust modeling platform supporting a wide range of diagrams including uml, sysml, and bpmn. it offers powerful features for software engineering, data modeling, and business process modeling., while ArgoUML provides argouml is a java-based, open-source uml modeling tool designed for creating dynamic and static diagrams in a structured manner. it supports a wide range of uml 1.4 diagrams and offers features to aid in the design process.. Compare their features and pricing to find the best match for your needs.

Pros & Cons Comparison

StarUML

StarUML

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Supports a wide range of diagram types (UML, SysML, BPMN, ERD)
Includes code generation and database reverse engineering
Extensible through plugins
Uses a text-based project format suitable for version control
Good feature set for the price point

Limitations

Lacks built-in real-time collaboration features
User interface could be more modern
Learning curve can be steep for beginners
ArgoUML

ArgoUML

Analysis & Comparison

Advantages

Free and open-source with a permissive license.
Supports a comprehensive set of UML 1.4 diagrams.
Cross-platform compatibility due to being Java-based.
Includes internal consistency checking for model validation.
Provides a model explorer for structured navigation.

Limitations

User interface appears somewhat dated.
Performance can be an issue with very large models.
Active development and community support may vary.
Focuses on the older UML 1.4 standard.
May lack some advanced features found in commercial tools.

Compare with Others

Explore more comparisons and alternatives

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare
Advertisement

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare

Compare features and reviews between these alternatives.

Compare